RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

ECLT

Eclipse Trading

EST. 2007

ATFUNDED

METRIC

ECLIPSE TRADING

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$49

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Eclipse Trading PROS

+Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
+Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
+Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
+Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

−No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
−Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
−Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD