RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs DPFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD

ATFunded

DPFD

DPFunded

ATFUNDED

METRIC

DPFUNDED

54/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

2.92/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$49BETTER

MIN COST

—$58

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

4BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Commodities, Indices

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

DPFunded PROS

+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded

Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH ATFD