RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
ATFunded vs Crypto Fund Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
ATFD
ATFunded
CRFT
Crypto Fund Trader
EST. 2022
ATFUNDED
METRIC
CRYPTO FUND TRADER
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
—$5,000
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
Crypto Fund Trader PROS
- +Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
- +Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
- +Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
- +Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform
Crypto Fund Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy