RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Bullwaves Prime

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
BWVP
Bullwaves Prime
ATFUNDED
METRIC
BULLWAVES PRIME
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
$49
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

BULLWAVES PRIME DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Bullwaves Prime PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any pros for Bullwaves Prime at this time.
  • +No platform or market information is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
  • +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

Bullwaves Prime CONS

  • No data whatsoever is available for Bullwaves Prime, making any evaluation impossible.
  • Complete absence of key metrics such as drawdown, profit split, and funding is a significant transparency concern.
  • Traders have no basis for comparison against industry averages with zero data disclosed.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Bullwaves Prime
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Bullwaves Prime Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy