RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Brightfunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
Brightfunded
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
ATFUNDED
METRIC
BRIGHTFUNDED
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER66/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$55
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Brightfunded PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
  • +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
  • +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Brightfunded
Higher trust score (66/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Brightfunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy