RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Blueberry Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
ATFUNDED
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
54/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
2.92/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$184
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
PASS RATE
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Lower trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Blueberry Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy