RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ATFunded vs Blueberry Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ATFD
ATFunded
Blueberry Funded
BBFD
Blueberry Funded
EST. 2024
ATFUNDED
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUNDED
54/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
52/100
2.92/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$49BETTER
MIN COST
$139
14dTIE
PAYOUT DAYS
TIE14d
PASS RATE
4BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
1

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

BLUEBERRY FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade
TYPES
Beginner Friendly, Low Cost

ATFunded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
  • +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
  • +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

Blueberry Funded PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
  • +Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

Blueberry Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
  • No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ATFunded
Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Blueberry Funded
Lower trust score (52/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ATFunded Full Review →Blueberry Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy