RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

TTP

The Trading Pit

EST. 2022

AQUA FUNDED

METRIC

THE TRADING PIT

54/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER74/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$2,000,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$5,000,000

$1BETTER

MIN COST

—$99

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

The Trading Pit PROS

+Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
+Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded

Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH AQUA