RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs Trading Cult

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
Trading Cult
TCLT
Trading Cult
EST. 2024
AQUA FUNDED
METRIC
TRADING CULT
54/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
53/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER5/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$2,000,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$2,000,000
$1BETTER
MIN COST
$30
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

TRADING CULT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
Fast Payout, Instant Funding

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

Trading Cult PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $30 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, lowering the barrier to entry.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with predictable and stable risk boundaries.
  • +Profit target of 8% aligns with the industry average of 7.9%, setting a fair challenge threshold.

Trading Cult CONS

  • News trading and EA/automated trading are both not allowed, severely restricting trading strategies.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, limiting flexibility for traders with longer-term positions.
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Trading Cult
Lower trust score (53/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Aqua Funded Full Review →Trading Cult Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy