Aqua Funded vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Aqua Funded EST. 2023 | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | — | 64/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%TIE | 90%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 14d | 1dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $14BETTER | $65 |
| MAX FUNDING | $400,000BETTER | $250,000 |
| RATING | — | 5/5 |
| REVIEW COUNT | 0 | 2BETTER |
| STEPS | 2-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | Trailing |
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto, Futures, Indices, Commodities
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match Trader
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the listed firms' average of 83.2%.
- +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the listed firms' average of $310,294.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $14 is far below the listed firms' average of $69.40.
- +Overall drawdown allowance of 10% is higher than the listed firms' average of 7.9%.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days.
- −Phase 1 profit target of 10% exceeds the listed firms' average of 8.1%.
- −Two evaluation steps required is above the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps.
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
- +Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
- −Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy