RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs Lux Trading Firm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

LUXT

Lux Trading Firm

EST. 2019

AQUA FUNDED

METRIC

LUX TRADING FIRM

54/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER76/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—75%

$2,000,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$10,000,000

$1BETTER

MIN COST

—$100

7dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

LUX TRADING FIRM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, advanced, large-cap

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

Lux Trading Firm PROS

+Max funding of $10,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering elite scaling potential.
+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, providing a faster path to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $100 is below the industry average of $186.7, keeping entry costs reasonable.
+Fixed drawdown type gives traders clear and stable risk parameters to plan around.

Lux Trading Firm CONS

−Profit split of 75% is notably below the industry average of 84.7%, significantly reducing trader earnings.
−Payout frequency is monthly, which is slower than most firms offering weekly or bi-weekly payouts.
−News trading is not allowed and fee refund is unavailable, reducing trader flexibility and cost recovery options.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded

Lower trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH AQUA