RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs Lionheart Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

LHFT

Lionheart Funding

AQUA FUNDED

METRIC

LIONHEART FUNDING

54/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$2,000,000

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

LIONHEART FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

Lionheart Funding PROS

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.
+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for Lionheart Funding.

Lionheart Funding CONS

−Almost no firm data is provided, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
−Without cost, payout, or funding data, traders cannot assess value against the $186.7 average challenge cost.
−Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant concern for traders making real financial decisions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded

Higher trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH AQUA