RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
AQUA FUNDED
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
54/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$2,000,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$2,000,000
$1BETTER
MIN COST
$42
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Aqua Funded Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy