RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Aqua Funded vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
AQUA FUNDED
METRIC
ONEFUNDED
54/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER55/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER1/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$2,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$1BETTER
MIN COST
—$59
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
35%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

Aqua Funded
Lower trust score (54/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
OneFunded
Higher trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Aqua Funded Full Review →OneFunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy