RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

AquaFutures vs ZoraFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQFT

AquaFutures

ZRFX

ZoraFX

AQUAFUTURES

METRIC

ZORAFX

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

10d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

AquaFutures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
+Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
+Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
+The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
−Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
−Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

ZoraFX PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
+Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

−Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

AquaFutures

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH AQFT