RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

AquaFutures vs PipFarm

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQFT
AquaFutures
PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
AQUAFUTURES
METRIC
PIPFARM
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
85%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$45
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • −Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

PROPDNA VERDICT

AquaFutures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

AquaFutures Full Review →PipFarm Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy