RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
AquaFutures vs Maven Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
AQFT
AquaFutures
MAVN
Maven Trading
EST. 2022
AQUAFUTURES
METRIC
MAVEN TRADING
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER68/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$1,000,000
—
MIN COST
$13
—
PAYOUT DAYS
10d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
AQUAFUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
MAVEN TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, ETFs
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader
AquaFutures PROS
- +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
- +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
- +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
- +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.
AquaFutures CONS
- −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
- −Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
- −Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.
Maven Trading PROS
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 significantly exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $13 is far below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
Maven Trading CONS
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, excluding a large segment of systematic traders.
- −Days to first payout at 10 days is above the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy