RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

AquaFutures vs City Traders Imperium

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

AQFT
AquaFutures
City Traders Imperium
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
AQUAFUTURES
METRIC
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$4,000,000
MIN COST
$129
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
25%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

AquaFutures PROS

  • +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
  • +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
  • +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
  • +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
  • Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
  • Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

City Traders Imperium PROS

  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
  • +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

AquaFutures
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
City Traders Imperium
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

AquaFutures Full Review →City Traders Imperium Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy