HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Apex Trader Funding vs TX3 Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021 | TX3 Funding EST. 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 63/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 100%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 5d | 1dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $199 | $65BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $300,000BETTER |
| RATING | 4/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 1BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | Fixed |
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, WealthCharts
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
TX3 FUNDING DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader, A-Trader
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
TX3 Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptional, far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $65 is well below the industry average of $186.7, reducing entry cost
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility for funded traders
TX3 Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is meaningfully below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
