RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Apex Trader Funding vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Apex Trader Funding
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
APEX TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
SAVIUS
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$300,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$300,000
$35BETTER
MIN COST
$285
8d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
31%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, large-cap

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

Apex Trader Funding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

  • Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
  • Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Apex Trader Funding Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy