Apex Trader Funding vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021	QT Funded EST. 2023
TRUST SCORE	63/100	—
PROFIT SPLIT	100%BETTER	80%
PAYOUT DAYS	5dBETTER	14d
MIN COST	$199	$33BETTER
MAX FUNDING	$150,000	$200,000BETTER
RATING	4/5	—
REVIEW COUNT	1BETTER	0
STEPS	1-step	2-step
DRAWDOWN	Trailing	Static-Balance

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Apex Trader Funding

Trust score 63/100. Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

QT Funded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.