RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Apex Trader Funding vs Kershner Trading Group
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
KRTG
Kershner Trading Group
EST. 2001
APEX TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$35
MIN COST
—
8d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
31%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
Kershner Trading Group PROS
- +Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
- +Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
- +Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.
Kershner Trading Group CONS
- −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
- −Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
- −Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy