Apex Trader Funding vs FundedNext

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021	FundedNext ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022
TRUST SCORE	63/100BETTER	55/100
PROFIT SPLIT	100%BETTER	80%
PAYOUT DAYS	5dBETTER	21d
MIN COST	$199	$33BETTER
MAX FUNDING	$150,000	$200,000BETTER
RATING	4/5TIE	4/5TIE
REVIEW COUNT	1TIE	1TIE
STEPS	1-step	2-step
DRAWDOWN	Trailing	Relative

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Apex Trader Funding

Higher trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

FundedNext

Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 21d. 80% profit split.