Apex Trader Funding vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021	Funded Futures Network EST. 2022
TRUST SCORE	63/100	—
PROFIT SPLIT	100%BETTER	80%
PAYOUT DAYS	5d	0dBETTER
MIN COST	$199	$135BETTER
MAX FUNDING	$150,000	$250,000BETTER
RATING	4/5	—
REVIEW COUNT	1BETTER	0
STEPS	1-step	1-step
DRAWDOWN	Trailing	EOD Trailing

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

Apex Trader Funding

Trust score 63/100. Slower payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

Funded Futures Network

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 0d. 80% profit split.