RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Apex Trader Funding vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Apex Trader Funding
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
APEX TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
ECLIPSE TRADING
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
$35
MIN COST
8d
PAYOUT DAYS
31%
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
futures, large-cap

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Apex Trader Funding PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

  • Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
  • Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
Eclipse Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Apex Trader Funding Full Review →Eclipse Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy