RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Apex Trader Funding vs Eclipse Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
APEX TRADER FUNDING
METRIC
ECLIPSE TRADING
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$300,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$35
MIN COST
—
8d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
31%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
Eclipse Trading PROS
- +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
- +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
- +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
- +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.
Eclipse Trading CONS
- −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
- −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
- −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Apex Trader Funding
Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy