HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
Apex Trader Funding vs E8 Markets
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021 | E8 Markets EST. 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 63/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 100%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 5d | 3dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $199 | $110BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $150,000 | $500,000BETTER |
| RATING | 4/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 1BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | EOD Trailing |
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, WealthCharts
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
E8 MARKETS DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MatchTrader, cTrader, MT5, TradeLocker
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
E8 Markets PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
- +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
- +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.
E8 Markets CONS
- −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
- −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy
