Apex Trader Funding vs Blueberry Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021	Blueberry Funded EST. 2024
TRUST SCORE	63/100	—
PROFIT SPLIT	100%BETTER	80%
PAYOUT DAYS	5dBETTER	14d
MIN COST	$199	$40BETTER
MAX FUNDING	$150,000	$200,000BETTER
RATING	4/5	—
REVIEW COUNT	1BETTER	0
STEPS	1-step	2-step
DRAWDOWN	Trailing	Static/Balance-based

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, providing maximum trading flexibility.
+Wide platform selection including MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, and DXtrade covers most trader preferences.
+Markets include stocks in addition to forex, indices, commodities, metals, and crypto, offering broad diversification.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a smaller share of earnings.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying trader income.
−No fee refund is offered, meaning traders cannot recover the challenge cost after passing.

Apex Trader Funding

Trust score 63/100. Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.

Blueberry Funded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.