RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Apex Trader Funding vs AquaFutures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

APEX

Apex Trader Funding

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021

AQFT

AquaFutures

APEX TRADER FUNDING

METRIC

AQUAFUTURES

61/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$300,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$35

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

31%

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: futures, large-cap

AQUAFUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Apex Trader Funding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

Apex Trader Funding CONS

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

AquaFutures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
+Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
+Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
+The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.

AquaFutures CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
−Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
−Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Apex Trader Funding

Higher trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.

START WITH APEX