RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The 5%ers vs Blue Guardian
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
5PRS
The 5%ers
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016
BLGD
Blue Guardian
THE 5%ERS
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
100%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—90%
$4,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$400,000
$39
MIN COST
—
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
18%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy