RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
The 5%ers vs AquaFutures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
5PRS
The 5%ers
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2016
AQFT
AquaFutures
THE 5%ERS
METRIC
AQUAFUTURES
61/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
100%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$4,000,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$39
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
18%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
THE 5%ERS DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, large-cap, advanced
AQUAFUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
The 5%ers PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Max funding of $4,000,000 vastly exceeds the industry average of $839,272, offering exceptional capital scale
- +Min challenge cost of $39 is well below the industry average of $186.70, minimising entry costs
- +Profit target of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to pass
The 5%ers CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Pass rate of 18% is very low, indicating the majority of traders fail the evaluation
- −Trailing drawdown type is the most restrictive, shrinking the drawdown buffer as profits grow
AquaFutures PROS
- +Listed as a futures firm, which offers an asset class not available at all prop firms.
- +Firm name suggests an association with the Aqua brand, which may indicate shared infrastructure or credibility.
- +Futures trading can provide access to high-liquidity instruments with defined contract specifications.
- +The futures category is a growing segment within prop trading, reflecting market demand.
AquaFutures CONS
- −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective assessment impossible.
- −Without metrics such as profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no comparisons can be made.
- −Traders should seek full disclosure of terms before considering this firm, as critical information is absent.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy