RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

323 Trading vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

323T

323 Trading

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

323 TRADING

METRIC

ONEFUNDED

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER55/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER1/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

35%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

323 TRADING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

323 Trading PROS

+Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
+Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
+Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.
+Insufficient data provided to identify meaningful advantages for this firm.

323 Trading CONS

−No data was provided for this firm, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−Traders cannot assess key metrics such as profit split, drawdown, or funding levels.
−Lack of data represents a significant transparency concern for prospective traders.

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

323 Trading

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH 323T