RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneFunded vs Ment Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

MNTF

Ment Funding

ONEFUNDED

METRIC

MENT FUNDING

55/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

1/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$59

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

35%

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

Ment Funding PROS

+Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
+No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
+Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
+Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

−No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
−No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
−Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneFunded

Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

START WITH 1FND