RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneFunded vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OneFunded
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
LCDT
Lucid Trading
ONEFUNDED
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
55/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
1/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$59BETTER
MIN COST
—$90
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
35%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

OneFunded PROS

  • +No time limits on eval
  • +4 challenge tracks
  • +Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

  • −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
  • −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneFunded
Higher trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

OneFunded Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy