RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OneFunded vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
1FND
OneFunded
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
ONEFUNDED
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
55/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
1/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
90%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$59—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
35%
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
ONEFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader
- TYPES
- forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
OneFunded PROS
- +No time limits on eval
- +4 challenge tracks
- +Transparent rules
OneFunded CONS
- −Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
- −Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy